Investor Room | Return to Investor Room

Athletic Director Deep Dive

Assessment Science, Protocols, and Platform Integration -- BASIS Independent Brooklyn
better athlete(TM) | Confidential -- Prepared for BASIS Independent Brooklyn
1

What Gets Measured

Six evidence-based biomechanical domains that predict non-contact injury risk

Every student-athlete completes a 20-minute movement quality screening during the pre-season combine. The screening evaluates six domains, each targeting a different biomechanical risk factor. These are not fitness tests -- they are validated clinical screening tools adapted for field use.

1

Single Leg Squat

Evaluates lower extremity alignment, hip and knee control, and trunk stability during a loaded single-leg movement. Identifies valgus collapse -- a primary predictor of ACL injury.

2

Tuck Jump Assessment

Observes bilateral landing mechanics during a repeated jumping task. Flags asymmetries in knee separation, foot placement, and landing stiffness that indicate neuromuscular deficits.

3

Landing Error Scoring System

A standardized tool for quantifying landing biomechanics during a jump-landing task. Captures errors in hip flexion, knee valgus, trunk lean, and ground contact pattern.

4

Y-Balance Test

Measures dynamic balance and reach asymmetry in three directions. Identifies side-to-side imbalances that are strongly correlated with lower extremity injury risk.

5

Single Leg Hop for Distance

Assesses functional power and stability during a single-leg takeoff and landing. Limb symmetry index (LSI) below 90% is a validated risk indicator.

6

Deceleration Quality

Evaluates the athlete's ability to control momentum during change-of-direction tasks. Poor deceleration mechanics are implicated in a majority of non-contact ACL injuries.

Evidence Base

Padua et al. (2009): Landing Error Scoring System is a valid clinical screening tool for ACL injury risk. Plisky et al. (2006): Y-Balance asymmetry >4cm predicts lower extremity injury with 2.5x relative risk.

2

The Risk Tier System

Five tiers from standard to critical, each with defined protocols

Each athlete receives a composite risk score that maps to a color-coded tier. Tiers drive warm-up assignment, monitoring frequency, and escalation protocols. The system is designed to be actionable without requiring medical expertise from coaches or administrators.

Green
Low Risk

Standard warm-up protocol. No modifications needed. Routine seasonal monitoring.

Yellow
Mild Concern

One domain flagged. Targeted exercises added to warm-up. Monitored weekly. Very common -- typically 20-30% of athletes.

Orange
Moderate Risk

Multiple domains flagged. Modified warm-up with 3-5 additional targeted exercises. Coach and AD alerted. Re-screen recommended at midseason.

Red
Elevated Risk

Significant biomechanical concern. Restricted activities recommended. Re-screen in 2 weeks. Parent notification. AD and coach briefed.

Critical
Immediate Referral

Professional referral required before return to full participation. AD, coach, and parent notified immediately. Documentation generated for referral provider.

Evidence Base

Sugimoto et al. (2015): Neuromuscular warm-ups reduce ACL injury by 50%. Risk stratification allows targeted allocation of prevention resources to highest-risk athletes.

3

Warm-Up Protocol Delivery

Evidence-based injury prevention warm-ups assigned by sport and customized by tier

Protocol Assignment Logic

Warm-up protocols are drawn from validated injury prevention programs, including neuromuscular training, dynamic stabilization, and plyometric progressions. Protocols are assigned based on two factors:

  • Sport -- soccer, basketball, volleyball, lacrosse, and other cutting/pivoting sports receive sport-specific protocols
  • Tier -- GREEN athletes receive the base protocol; YELLOW and ORANGE athletes receive additional targeted exercises appended to the base

What Coaches Receive

Each coach gets a team warm-up card showing the base protocol (12-15 minutes) plus a modification list for flagged athletes. Exercises include illustrated descriptions. No special training required.

Team Warm-Up Compliance -- Last 4 Weeks
Week 1
92%
Week 2
88%
Week 3
95%
Week 4
91%
Evidence Base

FIFA 11+ reduces injury incidence by 30-50% across 15+ randomized controlled trials. The PEP Program reduces ACL injuries by 72% in female athletes (Mandelbaum et al., 2005).

4

Training Load Monitoring

Weekly hours tracking, specialization alerts, and workload ratios

Why Training Load Matters

Overtraining is one of the strongest predictors of youth sports injury. Athletes who exceed recommended weekly training thresholds, specialize in a single sport year-round, or experience rapid spikes in training volume are at significantly elevated risk.

What Gets Tracked

  • Weekly training hours across all sports and activities
  • Sport specialization alerts (single-sport athletes flagged for additional monitoring)
  • Acute-to-chronic workload ratio -- a sudden spike above 1.5x baseline triggers an alert
  • Multi-sport participation patterns and transition periods between seasons

How ADs Use This

Training load data surfaces in the AD dashboard as weekly alerts. If an athlete's workload spikes -- for example, during a tournament week or when playing for both a school and club team simultaneously -- the AD receives a notification with context and recommended action.

Evidence Base

Emery et al. (2015): Structured training load management reduces all youth sports injuries by 35%. Gabbett (2016): Acute-to-chronic workload ratio is the strongest modifiable predictor of injury in team sports.

5

Rest and Recovery Intelligence

Lifestyle factors that integrate with movement data to adjust risk dynamically

Self-Report Data

Athletes complete brief weekly check-ins capturing sleep hours, perceived stress, hydration habits, and any pain or soreness. These take less than 60 seconds and can be completed via mobile device.

Dynamic Risk Adjustment

Recovery data modifies the base risk tier. An athlete who screens as GREEN but reports chronic sleep deprivation and high stress may be temporarily elevated to YELLOW for additional warm-up attention. Conversely, strong recovery habits can support tier maintenance over time.

What This Looks Like for ADs

The dashboard flags athletes whose self-reported recovery is consistently below thresholds. This allows proactive conversation with coaches and families before a minor issue becomes an injury.

6

Platform Integration

Connecting with your existing athletics management infrastructure

Roster and Schedule Syncing

Your school's existing athletics management platform integrates with Better Athlete for roster syncing, schedule awareness, and parent communication. When a new athlete is added to a team roster, they automatically appear in the Better Athlete system. Practice and game schedules inform training load calculations.

Parent Communication

Risk tier notifications and seasonal reports are delivered through your existing parent communication channels. Better Athlete generates the content; your platform delivers it -- maintaining a consistent communication experience for families.

Integration Overview
Roster sync -- automatic, daily
Schedule import -- automatic, updates with changes
Parent notifications -- triggered by tier assignment and season end
Alert routing -- AD, coach, and parent channels
7

What ADs See Day-to-Day

Dashboard views designed for quick decision-making

Morning Alert Digest

Each morning, the AD receives a summary of overnight changes: new pain reports, workload spikes, recovery flags, and any tier changes. Typical digest takes less than 2 minutes to review.

Team Readiness Overview

A single screen showing every active team with their risk distribution: how many GREEN, YELLOW, ORANGE, and RED athletes are on each roster. Color-coded bars allow instant comparison across sports.

Team Readiness -- All Fall Sports
Varsity Soccer
JV Soccer
Volleyball
Cross Country
Green Yellow Orange Red

Weekly Risk Trend

A trend line showing the total number of elevated-risk athletes (ORANGE+RED) across the program over time. Allows ADs to see whether the program is reducing risk or whether a specific sport is trending upward.

Game-Day Clearance View

Before each game, a filtered view shows only athletes on that day's roster with their current tier, last pain report, and warm-up compliance status. One glance confirms readiness.

8

Implementation Timeline

From pre-season combine to end-of-season report

August -- Pre-Season Combine

Initial Screening

All fall sport athletes complete the 6-domain movement screening during the first week of pre-season. Better Athlete staff administer the combine. Coaches and ADs observe but do not need to participate. Duration: approximately 2 hours per team.

September -- November

Regular Monitoring

Evidence-based warm-ups assigned and tracked. Weekly self-reports collected. Training load monitored. Dashboard alerts reviewed daily by AD. Coach briefings as needed for tier changes.

November -- End-of-Season Re-Screen

Progress Measurement

All athletes repeat the 6-domain screening. Individual and team-level progress reports generated. Parent reports sent. AD receives a program-wide summary with season injury data.

December -- Winter Sport Transition

Season Bridge Briefing

Athletes transitioning to winter sports carry their data forward. Winter sport coaches receive modified warm-up cards based on fall screening results. Multi-sport athletes benefit from continuous monitoring.